Mendworthy vs Redux

Redux charges 25% of the revenue it recovers above a baseline built from your historical Stripe Smart Retry data; Mendworthy charges a flat monthly fee regardless of how much we recover — $79/mo (or $65 annual) on Starter, $149/mo on Growth, $299/mo on Scale. With a percentage model your cost rises every time recovery does; a flat fee is a fixed number you choose. Redux can cost less when recovered volume is small, and a flat fee pulls ahead as recovery grows — everything above the fee you keep.

Fair question. Pay-on-performance removes upfront risk, and if you recover very little it can cost less. The trade is that a percentage keeps scaling with your success with no ceiling, while a flat fee stays fixed. You also get SMS and a live holdout measurement that Redux's published flow doesn't include. If predictable cost and keeping all of your recovered revenue past a fixed fee matter more than zero-if-zero billing, flat wins.

No — by design. Stripe's Smart Retries already schedule retries, so we don't duplicate that layer. Mendworthy focuses on the part Stripe does poorly: reaching the customer and making the card update effortless. Redux adds its own retry engine on top of Stripe; we deliberately don't.

Both, the same way. Mendworthy isn't segment-specific — it works for any Stripe subscription, B2C or B2B, because our lane is the customer conversation and the card update, not retry science tuned to consumer banking. Redux specializes in B2C; if that specialization matters to you, weigh it — but you don't have to be B2B to use us, and B2C subscriptions run through the exact same sequence.

Yes — on Growth and Scale, alongside email. Redux's published recovery flow is email-only. A text is often opened faster than an email, so SMS is a useful second channel once a customer hasn't acted on the first email.